🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 149+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage gold tone wrap ring

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (149 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$35
$58.33
Sale
βœ“ at no charge shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Check out this attractive vintage gold tone wrap ring you guys Size 8.5

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid distribution

↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage gold tone wrap ring

Check out this elegant vintage gold tone wrap ring you guys
Size 8.5

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 825023

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $58.33 USD

Sale Price: $35 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9590 reviews
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless for my needs
After a few days, it feels okay and I don’t regret it.
43 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extraordinary Vintage gold tone wrap ring
Packaging was basic, but the Vintage gold tone wrap ring is okay.
38 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely outstanding
So far, the Vintage gold tone wrap ring does its job and I don’t regret it.
5 people found this helpful

JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
The Vintage gold tone wrap ring works fine for daily use.
23 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific Vintage gold tone wrap ring!
From my experience, it feels solid enough so it’s acceptable.
12 people found this helpful